TopHolders
Settled on-chain

World Cup Final — Settlement Report

What the on-chain money did, from 62 hours of silence to a one-hour repricing.

Market data as of 2026-07-20 01:05 UTC · Position data as of 2026-07-20 17:10 UTC · Page generated 2026-07-20 17:18 UTC

1 · Settlement headline

Spain won the 2026 World Cup 1-0, and the market has settled on-chain. Settlement confirmed on 2026-07-20. Final redemption: $28.33M paid to Spain holders on a cost basis of $6.95M; $4.70M in Argentina positions expired worthless (worth $15.6M on paper at kickoff, after Argentina's price doubled post-semifinal). This page tracks the complete ledger: who called it, who missed it, and what the hedges actually cost.

Spain — champion market

99.9¢
Redeemed at $1.00$28.33M
Cost basis$6.95M
Tracked wallets49

Argentina — champion market

0.1¢
Redeemed$0 — expired worthless
Cost basis$4.70M
Tracked wallets29

Settlement basis: winning side redeems at $1.00 per share, losing side at $0 — the same cycle Polymarket settles on. Position data as of 2026-07-20 17:10 UTC.

2 · Money map — whales vs the crowd

Argentina was the louder market — $174M in volume against Spain's $152M. But volume isn't commitment. Within an hour of full time, Argentina's order book depth had evaporated to $514.12K — one-eleventh of Spain's — as market makers walked away from a settled question. The money was loud on the way in and gone the moment the outcome was certain. The whale positioning had been the tell all along: 401 whales held Spain YES against 58 on NO; on Argentina, 237 held YES. When the whistle blew, those 237 wallets zeroed together — a collective misjudgment, visible days before kickoff.

Spain

Volume$152.09M
Book depth$5.84M
Whales in market429
On YES / NO401 / 58

Argentina

Volume$174.31M
Book depth$514.12K
Whales in market305
On YES / NO237 / 87

Book depth as of 2026-07-19 22:05 UTC — one hour after full time. Volume as of 2026-07-20 01:05 UTC. Post-match books repopulated during settlement; the post-whistle snapshot is shown as the decision-relevant view of where market makers stood once the question was settled.

3 · The full odds timeline

Hourly sampling · times in UTC · kickoff, end of regulation, the 106th-minute goal and the final whistle marked.

World Cup final on-chain odds timeline, Spain and Argentina championship markets, UTC

Regulation ended 0-0 and the markets barely moved — the question was still open. The decisive repricing came with Torres's 106th-minute extra-time goal (~21:15 UTC), and by 22:05 UTC the championship markets had fully absorbed the result. Sixty-two hours of stillness, resolved in under an hour of extra time.

The final snapshot lagged the last trades in a dead order book; end-of-series values above use last traded price.

4 · Two stories, how they ended

The Biggest Bet on the Board

gud.hl's Argentina position — 12,354,112 shares built for $1.23M, worth $5.1M at kickoff, the largest single holding across both markets — expires worthless. The $555K clip at 9.5¢ on day 4 of the group stage was conviction; the decision to hold through the final was the bet. Both were real. Only one paid.

The Hedge That Barely Paid

mooseborzoi was the one true both-sides whale: YES on Spain, YES on Argentina. The winning leg made $563K; the losing leg burned $531K. Net: +$31.6K, +3.7% — insurance did its job, and insurance costs money. Allezpapa ran the same structure with a smaller Argentina leg and netted +451%. And wco26, whose Argentina position was negligible by settlement, was simply a Spain conviction bet that paid +716%. Three wallets, one label, three very different trades — the ledger doesn't care about the story you tell.

5 · Winners and wipeouts

Top 10 by Realized P&L, as of 2026-07-20 17:10 UTC. Settled figures: winning side redeems at $1.00 per share, losing side at $0.

Top 10 — best position

WalletSideCost basisRedemptionRealized P&L
asparagus2012Yes$445.98K$3.35M$2.90M (+650.6%)
AllezpapaYes$419.61K$2.68M$2.26M (+539.3%)
JsramYes$1.21M$3.12M$1.91M (+157.9%)
wco26Yes$201.29K$1.64M$1.44M (+716.7%)
thesingularityisnearYes$177.56K$1.40M$1.22M (+689.9%)
FootballFan98Yes$227.61K$1.15M$922.87K (+405.5%)
BreakTheBankYes$296.47K$1.03M$731.65K (+246.8%)
Joe-BidenYes$112.06K$767.17K$655.11K (+584.6%)
copa1970Yes$146.68K$780.19K$633.52K (+431.9%)
mooseborzoiYes$334.46K$897.04K$562.58K (+168.2%)

Top 10 — worst position

WalletSideCost basisRedemptionRealized P&L
gud.hlYes$1.23M$0$-1.23M (-100.0%)
mentionmarketNo$1.01M$0$-1.01M (-100.0%)
tankjackYes$1.01M$0$-1.01M (-100.0%)
mooseborzoiYes$530.98K$0$-530.98K (-100.0%)
mentionmarketYes$340.41K$0$-340.41K (-100.0%)
0xa0f2…1848Yes$214.02K$0$-214.02K (-100.0%)
Sunguyen86Yes$155.88K$0$-155.88K (-100.0%)
neutralwave23Yes$144.92K$0$-144.92K (-100.0%)
Joe-BidenYes$128.31K$0$-128.31K (-100.0%)
anuragYes$121.24K$0$-121.24K (-100.0%)

Rankings are per market leg — a wallet holding both markets appears once per market. Net across both markets where material: Allezpapa +451%, mooseborzoi +3.7%.

6 · Methodology

All figures derive from public on-chain activity and third-party market APIs. "Whale" denotes wallets with open positions above $10K in a tracked market. "Open positions value" is the current USDC market value of Yes-side holdings (shares × latest traded price at the stated timestamp); "total volume" is cumulative traded volume across all participants — the two measure different things and are never compared directly. P&L figures are realized on the same settlement cycle Polymarket uses: on resolution the winning side redeems at $1.00 per share and the losing side at $0. Price series sampled hourly from 2026-07-17 07:19 UTC; sampling density is disclosed on the chart. Trade capture thresholds are stated per table. Settlement ledger covers tracked top wallets (49 Spain / 29 Argentina), a subset of all whales in market. TopHolders reports positions, not picks — nothing here is financial advice.

Implied probabilityMarket YES price, 0-1, shown as a percentage
Cost basisShares × average entry price, from on-chain fills
Current valueRedemption value at settlement ($1.00 winning side, $0 losing side)
P&LRedemption minus cost basis, realized at on-chain settlement
TimesAll timestamps UTC